Before 80/20 loans became popular many buyers used a down payment assitance program (DPA). These were went hand-in-hand with government loans, FHA and VA, that required 3% down. The rules said that a seller couldn’t pay for the down payment like they can with closing costs.
But inexplicably they approved the DPA’s where the seller gave a 3% donation to a company such as Ameridream or Nehemiah, plus $500 – $1,000, and then that company gave the 3% to the buyer. All they did was add a middle man. This was government approved money laundering and everyone knew it. So instead of letting the seller pay 3%, they let this extra layer get added costing more money to the transaction.
Some will say that they should allow the DPA’s to stay. I disagree because of the cost and waste of the steps. We need to have a strong housing market with less people going into foreclosure. 80/20 conventional loans are gone because of the risk. Why should the government essentially underwrite 100% loans that no one else wants? This is part of the reason they have ended it.
If it is deemed worth the risk they should change the rule about the seller paying for the downpayment, without adding DPA’s who are add nothing to the transaction. And families can still give gifts, the government just closes a loop hole that was beyond blatant.
UPDATE: From Seth Harris at Northwest Metro Mortgage,
Guys,
Looks like all the investors (lenders) are getting skittish and looking to pull the Down Payment Assistance program early (it’s scheduled to go away Oct. 1st). I just got this from the underwriter…I’ll keep you updated:
Due to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, seller-funded down payment assistance programs as an eligible source of funds for loans funded on or before 9/30/08 due to our investor requirements they have requested we fund no later than 9/10/08.
Metrocities will be sending out MPP advising everyone of this DPA Requirement
This makes sense. Last year some rules changes caused many programs to go away in April of last year and people rushed to get in under the deadline. The banks probably don’t want a rush of these loans because they know the word will get out and it could easily be riskier people. There was a report that said that 2007 loans were defaulting faster than 2006 or 2005 loans.
Also I was just told that some lenders stopped doing loans with DPA’s on the 15th of August.
Related posts:







